Cuba Politics

Ricardo Alarcon calls Cuba Embargo ‘genocide’ ahead of UN vote

Posted October 24, 2004 by publisher in Cuba Politics.

Associated Press

Parliament speaker Ricardo Alarcon blasted Washington’s four-decade trade Embargo against Cuba as “genocide” Saturday as thousands gathered to draw attention to the upcoming UN vote to condemn the sanctions.

Alarcon noted that 70 per cent of Cuba’s 11.2 million citizens were born after the United States imposed trade sanctions on the Caribbean country in the early 1960s in an effort to undermine President Fidel Castro’s communist government.

“It’s a policy of genocide . . . aimed at causing suffering and hunger,” Alarcon said of the sanctions.

The rally was the first major political gathering in Cuba since Castro, 78, tripped and fell after a graduation ceremony speech in the central city of Santa Clara on Wednesday night.

Since then, Castro has assured the Cuban people he is well and remains firmly in control of the country he has ruled for 45 years.

Conspicuously absent from Saturday’s rally was Defence Minister Raul Castro, 73, the president’s younger brother and his designated successor.

Among those in the audience was Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque, who will travel to New York next week for the Embargo vote scheduled for Oct. 28.

For 12 consecutive years, the United Nations General Assembly has voted to urge the United States to end its Embargo against Cuba.

Last year, the non-binding resolution passed overwhelmingly with only Israel and the Marshall Islands joining the United States in voting against it.

Cuba has been under a U.S. trade Embargo since Castro defeated the CIA-backed assault at the Bay of Pigs in 1961. Americans are barred from travelling to Cuba unless they have a U.S. government waiver.

Creating a small opening in the trade Embargo, the U.S. Congress in 2000 year legalized direct commercial sales of American food to the communist island for the first time since 1961.

Member Comments

On October 24, 2004, Jesus Perez wrote:

I would not go as far as Mr. Alarcon in calling the embargo “genocide”, but certainly TERRORISM seems appropiate.

On October 25, 2004, I-taoist wrote:

Life on the animal farm:

And the third pig-in-line rose to the podium to rail against “the oppressors,”  those responsible for all the hardships, shortages, and hunger on the island farm. “If only….” he intoned and proceded to outline a list of woes attributable to the yankee “blockade,” painting a rosy utopian ideal at the end of his tirade.  Never alluding for a moment to the self made misery his band had created. 

Meanwhile, the cocky rooster to the north, in all his self-rightous delusion, played right into the pigs hand, serving up his platter of scapegoat, cooked to perfection.  His “embargo” would be tightened, to strangle the Head Pig out. 

And as both “gran jefes” screamed insults at each other across the 90 miles of turbulent and wind swept waters that seperated them, a small, thin and sickly island child, coughing up red his weakened lungs, hung his head and moaned. And he thought to himself of the two, “que barbaro, one is only the mirror image of the other.”