Havana Cuba Business Travel Culture and Politics

Havana Cuba News

Cuba Politics News

Posted February 17, 2005 by publisher in US Embargo

Email this article | Print this article | Search Havana Journal        

South Florida Sun-Sentinel Editorial Board
There are few governments on the planet that the Bush administration dislikes more than Fidel Castro’s regime in Cuba. Yet, it seems like sometimes U.S. policy helps the Communist government more than it undermines it.

For example, one would think the best way to prod a much-needed transition to democracy would be to increase and spread U.S. influence on the island. So why would the Bush administration implement policies that curtail America’s sway, including limits on money sent and visits by Cuban-Americans?

Now there’s another perplexing twist in Washington’s Cuba diplomacy. The Treasury Department has warned a Cuban exile activist living in Havana that he might be violating the embargo by ignoring restrictions on travel to the island. Presumably, he could face penalties.

The individual in question is Eloy Gutierrez-Menoyo, a rebelde who fought alongside Castro during the 1950s revolution. After Castro turned to the Soviet Union and established a Marxist state, Gutierrez-Menoyo broke ranks with the maximo leader and led his own pro-democracy rebellion. He was captured and spent 22 years in jail for his “betrayal.”

He was released in 1987 and moved to Miami, where he later founded an organization that seeks peaceful reform in Cuba. Insisting that change had to come from within the island, he “reverse defected” two years ago during a trip to Cuba—meaning he refused to leave.

Gutierrez-Menoyo’s tactics are controversial. Some U.S. exiles believe he has sold out, others see him as a courageous man of principle. One can agree with him or not. That’s politics.

The larger question is whether the United States should employ a heavy-handed approach toward people who seek to bring change to Cuba’s government and institutions. Why is the U.S. government dissuading individuals from spreading good will toward America and fostering a debate in Cuba about reform and openness?

President Bush has correctly said U.S. security depends on efforts to bring the light of freedom to oppressed countries, and he has singled out Cuba as one place that is stuck in the political Dark Ages. So why is the administration preventing broader contacts between Americans and Cubans, and perhaps infringing on the right of Americans to travel freely in the process? Maybe it’s time for a court challenge.

America’s strength lies in its ideals and people. Unfortunately, the Bush administration doesn’t seem to trust its countrymen to serve as ambassadors abroad. This “government knows best” attitude bolsters the foe in Havana, rather than weakening Castro’s grip on the island.

  1. Follow up post #1 added on February 17, 2005 by jesusp with 246 total posts

    The Sun-Sentinel is right, it is time for a court challenge to the infringement on the right of Americans to travel freely and even more important than that, the right of Cuban/Americans who pay taxes and are U.S. citizens to visit their families in Cuba. It is a shameful, stupid policy that is not only cruel to Cuban/Americans on both sides, but also gives legitimacy to all the rethoric that comes out of Habana.

  2. Follow up post #2 added on February 17, 2005 by I-taoist with 213 total posts

    It is good to see a south Florida newspaper “get it”:  our policies not only do little harm to Castro and the communists, they actually give him strength and support.  Is it really too complex an idea for Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice to understand, or is it that their ideology is so supreme as to obscure reason?  One can possibly understand the emotionality of Cuban-Americans who continue down the dead end path of embracing embargo and isolation as a means of undermining Castro, but U.S. policy makers should not be subject to such personal vendetta, that clouds common sense, and right. 

  3. Follow up post #3 added on February 17, 2005 by bernie with 199 total posts

    Where do I send my donation for the COURT CHALLENGE
    to the infringement of my right to travel freely.

  4. Follow up post #4 added on February 18, 2005 by waldo with 264 total posts

    One more example of the intransigence of Bush and his adviser from Miami. Black or White, no other choice, not even in between Menoyo.

  5. Follow up post #5 added on March 01, 2005 by PABLOPUEBLO with 86 total posts

    First of all I have to say,that Castro stwardship for a long
    time before,was upholding the “flag” “de la intransigencia
    revolucionaria” and that meant breakdown relationships between
    cubans living in the island and their families,I was one of
    many who had to suffered those very bad policy and now you see
    more of the same,but now on the american side,None in Democracy
    can stop people visiting families in other countries.Family,
    strictily family relations should be above any political consideration,especially in the majority of Latin People,sometimes I guess some of the advisers in cuban policy in
    Bush administration,are like officials of the cuban intelligence apparatus.It is embarrasing to know about.

Would you like to add more information?

Only members can add more information. Please register or log in

  • Advertise at Havana Journal Inc
We recommend this AirBnB Food and Drink Experience... Cuban flavors: Food, Rum and Cigars
Images of Cuba
Hotel Vedado in 1950s vacation guide
Follow Havana Journal
SUBSCRIBE to our Cuba Watch newsletter
LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

CONNECT with us on Linked In

Section Archive
Havana Journal, Inc. BBB Business Review

Member of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy