Havana Cuba Business Travel Culture and Politics

Havana Cuba News

Cuba Politics News

Posted September 28, 2004 by Dana Garrett in Castro's Cuba

Email this article | Print this article | Search Havana Journal        

BY CHRISTINA HOAG | Miami Herald

Seeking to overturn restrictions against publishing works from Cuba and other blacklisted countries, a group of scholarly publishers and authors sued the U.S. Treasury Department on Monday.

‘‘Ideas should not be embargoed,’’ said Janet Francendese, editor in chief of Temple University Press, one of five publishers that have frozen Cuban projects for fear of being fined from the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Six Cuban publications—the most from any embargoed nation—are on the groups’ list of in-limbo works. Their topics range from birds to music to short stories.

The suit comes amid a Bush administration crackdown on relations with Cuba. Earlier this year, travel to the island was curbed and the amount of family remittances slashed. Now, publishers say, they, too, are falling victim to the get-tough policy.

According to OFAC, presses must obtain licenses to publish works from embargoed nations, which also include Iran and Sudan, or risk fines of up to $1 million or prison sentences of up to 10 years.

The Treasury Department declined to comment on the lawsuit, spokeswoman Molly Millerwise said.

But Millerwise noted that OFAC’s rules were designed not to curtail ‘‘the free flow of information and exchange of ideas’’ but to prohibit providing a service to citizens of the countries in question.

‘‘Publishers are free to reproduce, translate, style and copy edit and engage in peer review with respect to informational materials from countries subject to sanctions,’’ an OFAC statement read.

Added Millerwise: ``There’s a line between informational material being exempt and providing a service.’‘

Such services include making deals with writers for unfinished works, altering or collaborating on works and promoting or marketing new or existing works.

‘‘This is the whole business of publishing,’’ said Larry Siems, director of freedom to write and international programs at the PEN American Center. ``As far as we know, these regulations had never been enforced.’‘

PEN, a literary group, is a plaintiff in the suit, as are the Association of American Publishers’ Professional/Scholarly Publishing Division, the Association of American University Presses and Arcade Publishing. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in New York.

‘‘How can the United States uphold our position as a beacon for the free exchange of ideas and science if we ourselves censor authors because of where they live,’’ asked Marc Brodsky, chairman of the AAP/PSP.

The issue first arose in August 2003, when the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers asked OFAC for a ruling on whether copy editing an Iranian document and submitting it for review by other engineers before publication violated the rules.

Publishers said they were surprised when, at first review, OFAC said it was a violation.

They added that they had always been protected under the 1988 Berman Amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act, which prohibits restrictions to informational exchanges.

In April, OFAC ruled that copy editing did not constitute ‘‘providing a service.’’ The publishers, who have met with OFAC officials, said they chose to sue in a bid to end the issue definitively.

Cuba watchers say the issue stems from the Bush administration’s hardened stance toward the island.

‘‘They want to limit the amount of money going into Cuba from publishing anything,’’ said John S. Kavulich, president of the U.S. Cuba Trade and Economic Council. ``Anytime a document from Cuba is published in the U.S., it validates the revolution.’‘

Others note that Cuba does not allow U.S. documents to be published on the island and say the United States should reciprocate.

‘‘Why should we publish theirs,’’ asked Jaime Suchlicki, director of the University of Miami’s Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies.

 

  1. Follow up post #1 added on September 28, 2004 by Jesus Perez

    An embargo on books and ideas. And we actually pay Ms. Millerwise to keep an eye on things like this at the U.S. Treasury Dept? One more point Mr. Suchlicki, we should publish theirs because we claim to be better than them, we pride ourselves on being a free society and in most cases we are, but this is not one of our better moments.


  2. Follow up post #2 added on September 28, 2004 by Chulo

    Mr. Perez, I finally agree on something with you.  I wouldn’t take the tone you did with Jaime, he’ a very nice, intelligent man who just made an off-the-cuff statement.  I would allow Cuba to print whatever they want and bring it here.  That way, people can see how they continously lie about any and all historical occurences, particularly those in Cuba.  But again, liberals and ignorant individuals here in the US would just read the Cuban books, and believe them over the actual facts.  But like you say, we are better than them.  (oh, and again, try to distinguish “them”...Government v. people.)


  3. Follow up post #3 added on September 30, 2004 by Jesus Perez

    Chulo, people that read book, liberals or conservatives, are not ignorant, it is those that do not read books, that are.


Would you like to add more information?


Only members can add more information. Please register or log in

  • Advertise at Havana Journal Inc
Images of Cuba
Caribbean Parade - Cuban art - Painting by Wifredo Lam
Follow Havana Journal
SUBSCRIBE to our Cuba Watch newsletter
LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

CONNECT with us on Linked In

Section Archive
Havana Journal, Inc. BBB Business Review



Member of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy