Havana Cuba Business Travel Culture and Politics

Havana Cuba News

Cuba Politics News

Posted April 27, 2009 by publisher in US Embargo

Email this article | Print this article | Search Havana Journal        

By GINGER THOMPSON | New York Times

Seizing the momentum from recent meetings with Latin American leaders, the Obama administration is quietly pushing forward with efforts to reopen channels of communication with Cuba, according to White House and State Department officials.

The officials said informal meetings were being planned between the State Department and Cuban diplomats in the United States to determine whether the two governments could open formal talks on a variety of issues, including migration, drug trafficking and other regional security matters.

And the administration is also looking for ways to open channels for more cultural and academic exchanges between Cuba and the United States, the officials said.

The next steps, said a senior administration official, would be meant to “test the waters,” to see whether the United States and Cuba could develop a “serious, civil, open relationship.”

After saying the United States was “ready to talk about a series of issues,” the official added, “This thing with Cuba is going to take a lot of time, and it may not work.”

Officials who discussed the plans did so on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the efforts.

The details and scope of the administration’s outreach to Cuba are still being worked out, they said. But their comments indicated a departure from the White House’s previous position that it would not make further moves toward engagement until the Castro government reciprocated President Obama’s lifting of restrictions on Cuban-Americans who wished to travel to Cuba or send money to relatives on the island.

Mr. Obama has faced mounting pressure from Latin America and from his supporters in this country to do more to reverse the United States’ 47-year-old trade embargo against the Castro dictatorship. Cuba has become the litmus test by which many Latin American nations measure the United States’ commitment to improving relations with the region.

Polls suggest that there is increasing support among Cuban-Americans for ending the United States’ policy of isolation toward Cuba. And proposals have been made in both houses of Congress that would lift restrictions on travel to Cuba for all Americans.

In an interview, a State Department official described the pressure building for a new policy toward Cuba as a “steamroller” and said that the administration was “trying to drive it, rather than get run over by it.”

The official said any overtures toward Cuba would be made cautiously, allowing Mr. Obama to walk a fine line between those who want to end the embargo and those who see any engagement with Cuba as making concessions to a dictatorship. The official said that the administration also wanted to be careful to make it clear that its openness to engagement with Cuba did not mean the United States would turn a blind eye to the Cuban government’s poor record on human rights.

Experts on Cuba said there were good reasons for Mr. Obama’s caution. Among them is that the president has a full legislative agenda and does not want opposition by anti-Castro conservatives to interfere with more pressing concerns. The experts added that it was almost impossible to predict Havana’s next move and that the Cuban government had a history of shutting the door each time there was any serious move toward improving relations. Indeed, after the recent Latin American summit meeting, Fidel Castro said that Mr. Obama had misinterpreted comments by President Raúl Castro, his brother, that “everything” would be up for discussion.

Carl E. Meacham, who is a senior foreign policy adviser to Senator Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana, and who wrote a report critical of the United States’ embargo, said: “We in Washington have to focus on our own objectives, and not on events in Havana. What we’re doing is threatening to President Castro, and there will be reaction. But we have to keep moving forward.”

The Obama administration has indicated that it would like the Cuban government to stop charging fees on remittances sent to the island, open Cuba to American telecommunications companies and release all political prisoners.

But another State Department official, echoing Mr. Meacham, said the United States would not delay its own efforts while waiting for Havana to make suchmoves.

“I don’t think we want to paint a big red line in the sand to preclude any conversations,” the official said. “We need to begin having conversations.”

  1. Follow up post #1 added on May 01, 2009 by Juan M. Gonzalez with 2 total posts

    Where has the so-called failure of the embargo been?  Correct me if I’m wrong, the embargo was placed on Cuba because of the Castros’ theft of American-owned property without compensation.  Cuba settled claims with other countries, but not the U.S. (probably because of the size of the claim, over $1 Billion in then-1960s dollars) The U.S. re-established relations with Communist China after President Nixon secured the American claims after the 1949 communist takeover, the U.S. did the same with Vietnam and even more recently with Libya.  The American Left always says that Cuba is no different than any other tyrannical regime we do business with but fails to mention that those countries all came back with cash in hand and settled these legitimate claims, all a direct result of the trade embargo placed on Cuba for the same thing.  The U.S. Government has all the right to defend the interests of American citizens no matter where it may be situated in the world.  I’m sorry that Cuba decided to steal our property and now wants the U.S. taxpayers to pay to fix the property up so they monarchy in Cuba can stay in power.  Return the property or the cash has always been policy of the U.S. Government.  It has been a resounding SUCCESS.  No one in the U.S. cares what the monarchy in Cuba does to its people not what type of “government” it may have, all Americans care is that property be respected and not taken by force.  Since the trade embargo was placed on Cuba, no other country has stolen American property.  I call that a SUCCESS.


Would you like to add more information?


Only members can add more information. Please register or log in

  • Advertise at Havana Journal Inc
Images of Cuba
Big Chevy grille
Follow Havana Journal
SUBSCRIBE to our Cuba Watch newsletter
LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

CONNECT with us on Linked In

Section Archive
Havana Journal, Inc. BBB Business Review



Member of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy