Havana Cuba Business Travel Culture and Politics

Havana Cuba News

Cuba Politics News

Posted January 31, 2007 by publisher in US Embargo

Email this article | Print this article | Search Havana Journal        

Mark Silva | Chicago Tribune

With longtime Cuban leader Fidel Castro believed to be on or near his death-bed, a lot of American congressmen believe the decades-old U.S. trade embargo with Cuba should see the same fate.

With hope, perhaps, that they can open the door to Cuba just a little wider, a bipartisan pair of congressmen has offered a bill, the Cuban American Family Restoration Rights Act, to enable people with relatives in Cuba to travel there freely and deliver family aid. Reps. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.) and Bill Delahunt (D-Mass.) today offered their bill as a long-awaited remedy for families divided by a mere 90 miles of the Florida Straits and nearly 50 years of failed American political policy.

Any break in the trade embargo faces rough waters, however, with the Republican, Cuban-American community of South Florida holding Congress and the Bush administration alike to its commitments to exact as much punishment as possible on the Communist Castro regime. And neither party takes Cuban politics likely – the Clinton administration’s insistence on returning the young Cuban refugee, Elian Gonzalez, who had lost his mother in a raft crossing to Cuba during the presidential election campaign of 2000, probably cost Vice President Al Gore the state of Florida, and the White House as well.

“The bill can be said to be about our policy with Cuba,’’ Delahunt said today of the legislation that he and LaHood have filed, pointing to “a policy that I believe has been a total abysmal failure for some 47 years, administration after administration. It’s a policy that’s reduced American influence on the island to almost nothing as dramatic changes are occurring as we speak.

“It’s about moral values and family values, if you will,’’ he said. “And this bill is an effort to change an immoral policy, one that has caused pain and suffering to our own citizens, as well as to Cubans, and clearly, it has tarnished our image all over the world. ‘’

Under the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba, Americans are prohibited from travel to Cuba. While Americans with family in Cuba are allowed to periodically visit and send money or medicine, the White House has limited those visits to immediate family members and limited them to visits every three years, the congressman complains.

“I would submit that it is stunning in its cruelty,’’ Delahunt said. “It’s anti-family. It’s certainly not American. And it only magnifies the pain and anguish and the heartache that Cubans and Cuban Americans already have to suffer because of the relationship between our two governments.’‘

LaHood said Delahunt had asked him to join the cause a few weeks ago. As a member of the House Agriculture Committee, LaHood has supported freer trade. “I have supported the idea of food. I have supported the idea of trade. I have supported the idea of medicine,’’ LaHood said.

“This really does comport with my own beliefs that when you have a country 90 miles off our border, we ought to have a strong relationship with them, whether we like or dislike or agree or disagree with the government there,’’ the Illinois congressman said. “There are many governments in this world of ours that we don’t agree with, but we allow people to take care of their families, and we allow people to come back and forth, and we allow people to have the opportunity to be with their families. And to restrict this particular country 90 miles off our border, I think, is not good policy.’‘

LaHood, of Peoria, added this: “I don’t know if I even have any Cuban-Americans in my district. This is something—it’s common sense.’‘

Asked why they have stopped short of seeking to lift all travel restrictions to Cuba, Delahunt notes that he and others already have filed legislation proposing that – and LaHood supports it.

“I think it’s important that we focus on lifting the restrictions on family travel, because it says something about us as a people,’’ LaHood said. “It’s no secret that America’s image in the world has suffered. We’re at its low point, if you will, its nadir, in terms of all of the polling data that I’ve seen.

“Look,’’ LaHood said, “I’m for opening up all kinds of opportunities with Cuba. But as I said, in this process that we work in around here, you know, it’s step by step. I voted for amendments on appropriation bills to allow us to provide food, to provide medicine. And that’s the way you really begin to build the kind of momentum to get to where some of us would like to be with Cuba. And again, as Bill said, this sends the message. It’s a good first step, as we inaugurate the 110th Congress, to send a message there are a lot of members around here who think this particular policy is not a good policy and we ought to move on from here.’’

  1. Follow up post #1 added on February 01, 2007 by Varsi Padayachee

    People to people contact is, perhaps, the most effective way to effect a progressive mind set in Cuba. Force fed policies have proven to be unmitigated disasters, as is evidenced by the current US policy. The change in Cuba, must come from within the Island itself, instituted by its people. Interference and rhetoric will be seen as meddling by outside forces, hardening the resolve. Many of the dissidents on the Island are against the existing US policy and the newly funded US State Dept. effort to destabalize the Island. The dissidents themselves have asked the US not to proceed, because it will diminish their credibility, casting them as stooges of the US. The US, as is the case in Iraq, the other Middle Eastern Countries and LATAM, continues to ignore good and pragmatic advice.
    This bill is a good first step. However, it must be careful in its implication given that there is much conversation that this will be an ideal opportunity to buy up cheap Cuban land. This was echoed by Tucker Carlson of MSNBC on Tuesday evening. Sadly, this seems to be the prevailing mindset, callous greed that gives no mind to the betterment of the Cuban people.


  2. Follow up post #2 added on February 01, 2007 by bernie with 199 total posts

    NO: the image of the American people has not suffered.  It is the image of the USA congresspersons & senators who are looked by the world’s community that has suffered, because of their lack of common sense and competence.

    Congress should cut all funding of any program that involves Cuba.
    Especially funding to the state dept. who prosecutes citizens who have traveled to Cuba.  Without funding their is no prosecuting.


  3. Follow up post #3 added on February 01, 2007 by Varsi Padayachee

    Bernie, I did imply that image of the American people has suffered. When I refer to the US, by implication it os our Govt. Quite the contrary, the American public, by and large are seen in an extremely favorable light by the world over. It is our insipid policies, cloaked in false democracy that grates on people. It is rather ironical that for a democracy we impose undemocratic rules on our people by forbidding travel to Cuba. Rather like our call to arms against terrorists. Yet we harbour terrorists like Posada Carrilles, Orlando Bosch, et al.


  4. Follow up post #4 added on February 01, 2007 by bernie with 199 total posts

    No problem Varsi.  I like reading your comments, in my book, I think you are an okay guy>


Would you like to add more information?


Only members can add more information. Please register or log in

  • Advertise at Havana Journal Inc
Images of Cuba
Raul Castro with Argentina Estevez
Follow Havana Journal
SUBSCRIBE to our Cuba Watch newsletter
LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

CONNECT with us on Linked In

Section Archive
Havana Journal, Inc. BBB Business Review



Member of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy