Havana Cuba Business Travel Culture and Politics

Havana Cuba News

Cuban American News

Posted October 04, 2007 by publisher in Cuban Americans

Email this article | Print this article | Search Havana Journal        

Original title: Study: How to Recoup Assets in Cuba

By OSKAR GARCIA Associated Press Writer

Federal officials planning for a post-Fidel Castro Cuba were sent recommendations Thursday on how to handle a decades-old puzzle: recouping billions of dollars for those whose assets were seized after the dictator took power in 1959.

A group of Creighton University scholars commissioned by the U.S. Agency for International Development based their advice on speculation of how Cuba will move forward after Castro dies.

Castro, 81, has not been out in public since July last year, announcing he had undergone emergency intestinal surgery and was ceding power to his younger brother, Raul.

The United States’ relationship with Cuba could be renewed if Cuba shows signs of a burgeoning democracy. But Cuba is obligated by international law to compensate owners of seized property, and settling American claims would be essential to rebuilding the tie.

U.S. officials were expected to use the study to help them decide how the country should move forward with the island nation, depending on how Cuba progresses.

“This is a comprehensive report, but I must emphasize it’s a starting point because there will be a lot of issues, particularly in terms of the process and the legal instruments to be developed,” said Elaine Grigsby, director of the International Development Agency’s Cuba Transition to Democracy Program.

Grigsby said that both a new Cuban government and the United States would have to agree on the process in order to settle the claims.

The Creighton scholars tasked to build a model to handle claims from Americans, Cuban exiles and current Cubans said in their report that the United States needs to make sure the new Cuban economy doesn’t get destroyed while trying to square away claims.

“The worst possible outcome would be if the claims process were contributing to economic misery on the island once there was a real change on the islands,” said Patrick Borchers, the team leader and vice president for academic affairs for the university.

Nearly 6,000 American claims have been determined valid by the U.S. Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, which the study values at about $6 billion in current dollars, with interest. The claims are wide-ranging, from homes to corporate assets, sugar mills and oil refineries.

The study suggests that if Cuba tried to pay the claims back in hard currency, it would be able to pay only a few cents on the dollar, and Cuban assets frozen in the United States would hardly dent the claims.

Instead, the study suggests settling claims in ways that will foster Cuba’s growth, by giving claimants development rights and tax breaks or other opportunities for financial gain.

“It’s not going to be a one-size-fits all deal,” Borchers said, but settling the claims is linked directly with lifting the U.S. embargo against Cuba.

More claims come from Cuban-Americans who were Cuban when communism took hold. Their claims were not certified by the same commission that judged American claims, the study said.

The study presents two models to handle claims from each group:

The tribunal that would handle American claims would have nine members: three each from the United States and Cuba and three more picked by the six already on the panel. Its rulings would be final, enforceable in both Cuba and the United States.

A Cuban special claims court would handle claims from Cuban exiles and would be independent within the Cuban judicial system with judges appointed in consultation with the United States.

The study says Cuban claims against the Cuban government would be a “wholly internal” matter, but United States should make sure Cuba’s solution doesn’t end up hurting the people.

The study says many experts believe a slow transition will start toward the end of Raul Castro’s regime and move forward under a new socialist regime. The study says a quick transition to democracy is unlikely.

Miami businessman Teo Babun, whose family lost a cement plant, some mining properties and shipping and lumber rights in 1960 to the expropriation, says that’s a bold assumption.

“That’s pretty darn gutsy for a bunch of lawyers to be predicting _ that’s the job of the U.S. State Department to make,” he said.

A request for comment from the U.S. State Department by The Associated Press was not immediately returned.

Babun has followed Cuba’s situation closely as the chief executive of Babun Group Consulting Inc., a group seeking business opportunities in a new Cuba. He also is president of Evangelical Christian Humanitarian Outreach for Cuba.

Babun praised the study’s effort but said it made some bad assumptions and came to some conclusions that won’t work, like having the United States help pick judges for Cuban exile claims.

“Why in the world would the Cuban government appoint judges in consultation in the United States if it’s an all Cuban court,” Babun said. “I would think other countries would be insulted by that statement.”

Borchers said he did not expect the models remain unchanged.

“The hope is that when the day comes _ and it eventually will _ that there’d be some ... starting point for the discussions,” Borchers said.

  1. Follow up post #1 added on October 04, 2007 by publisher with 3905 total posts

    Your American tax dollars at work folks. Read these two articles about how Creighton University took $750,000 from USAID. I don’t know if they spent all this money on just this study but somebody should investigate the ties between USAID and Creighton University executives.

    Every time I read the term “U.S. Agency for International Development” it seems that I can easily read it as “US taxpayer dollars wasted”.

    Read these two articles from the Havana Journal and do you own homework.

    Creighton University USAID grant story author needs to check his facts




    Creighton University celebrates $750,000 tainted grant money from USAID insider

    Cuba consulting services

  2. Follow up post #2 added on October 04, 2007 by publisher with 3905 total posts

    Also, don’t get me started on the whole Cuba property claims issue. Sure, I feel bad for the Cubans who lost their homes, land and businesses but they came to America and made a better life for themselves. By supporting the Embargo which restricted themselves from returning to Cuba, they pretty much gave up any right they had to reclaim Cuban property.

    Now $750k more was wasted of US taxpayer money to simply investigate the possibility of what might be a proposed solution to the problem of Cuban Americans demanding to get their property back.

    Good thing Fidel is still alive so Creighton University and other anti-Castro organizations can continue to drink off the tit of the American taxpayer.


    Since we paid $750k for the study… Mr. Borchers, anyway we can see a copy of the study?

    Cuba consulting services

  3. Follow up post #3 added on October 04, 2007 by manfredz with 464 total posts

    altho i can understand the loss that being exiled or escaping Cuba caused many who took up residence in the US, I think it best for teh future of teh island if they gave up any claims fo return of assets.  Again drawing from my European experiences, when German was reunifying both Poland and czeckosolvakia were worried big time that Germans who were kicked out in 1945 would be wanting return of their assets or compensation for them.  The federal German government went on record as saying it isn’t going to happen and groups representing these exiled groups (main one being the Bund der Vertiebene) also finally ended up going along with it.  As a result relationships between these states went a whole lot smoother.
    Hopefully most Cuban Americans can do the same - the road to a non-communist Cuba is going to be very rocky indeed without crippling claims for return of assets or compensation adding to this difficuty.

  4. Follow up post #4 added on October 04, 2007 by Cuban Dan

    I think most of the people crying out for return on assets lost are American businesses.  I think it said in the article that the $6 Billion in claims did not include cuban exiles.  Honestly my family doesn’t want to go back, im happy here, and I plan to be here the rest of my life.  I think there is a very large group of exiles who feel the same way. 

    I wouldn’t mind purchasing some vacation property though…

Would you like to add more information?

Only members can add more information. Please register or log in

  • Advertise at Havana Journal Inc
We recommend this AirBnB Food and Drink Experience... Cuban flavors: Food, Rum and Cigars
Images of Cuba
Isle of Pines Steamship Company in 1928
Follow Havana Journal
SUBSCRIBE to our Cuba Watch newsletter
LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

CONNECT with us on Linked In

Section Archive
Havana Journal, Inc. BBB Business Review

Member of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy